Marrickville Council v Cleary [2014] NSWLEC 203
There was clearly a serious question to be tried because the Council's fire safety evidence established concern about an imminent fire risk at premises where residential use was prohibited. However, on the balance of convenience, Mr Cleary was permitted to remain until 14 August 2014 because he had arranged alternative accommodation from that date and had referred to measures taken to mitigate fire risk.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Relief by Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Interlocutory relief granted, with operation of the order suspended until 14 August 2014.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunction' 'residential Use of Premises' 'zoning' 'fire Safety' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Relief by Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a serious question to be tried supporting interlocutory relief in relation to use of the premises for residential accommodation.' 'Whether the balance of convenience required Mr Cleary to vacate the premises immediately or permitted him to remain until 14 August 2014.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was clearly a serious question to be tried because the Council's fire safety evidence established concern about an imminent fire risk at premises where residential use was prohibited. However, on the balance of convenience, Mr Cleary was permitted to remain until 14 August 2014 because he had arranged alternative accommodation from that date and had referred to measures taken to mitigate fire risk.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory relief granted, with operation of the order suspended until 14 August 2014.
Orders
- ['The order sought by the Council in prayer 1 was made.' 'The operation of that order was suspended until 14 August 2014.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment