SafeWork NSW v Mars Commercial Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 531
Mars Commercial Pty Ltd was the principal contractor and failed to eliminate or mitigate an obvious and foreseeable risk of falls from height by not undertaking a high risk work assessment and providing adequate fall protection. The duty was nondelegable and required positive measures to ensure safety. The offence was objectively serious due to the gravity of the risk, availability of simple mitigation steps, and substantial injury sustained. The company’s post-incident actions and plea of guilty were mitigating factors, warranting a reduction in penalty.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Mars Commercial Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and imposition of fine and other orders
- Legal Topics
- Work Health and Safety, Duty of Persons Conducting Business, Risk of Death or Serious Injury, Sentencing Principles, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, General and Specific Deterrence, Prosecutor's Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork NSW
Prosecutor
Mars Commercial Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mars Commercial Pty Ltd failed to comply with its health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), exposing workers to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Act.
- 2 Appropriate penalty, including consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors, for breach of work health and safety duty.
Ratio Decidendi
Mars Commercial Pty Ltd was the principal contractor and failed to eliminate or mitigate an obvious and foreseeable risk of falls from height by not undertaking a high risk work assessment and providing adequate fall protection. The duty was nondelegable and required positive measures to ensure safety. The offence was objectively serious due to the gravity of the risk, availability of simple mitigation steps, and substantial injury sustained. The company’s post-incident actions and plea of guilty were mitigating factors, warranting a reduction in penalty.
Court Disposition
Conviction and imposition of fine and other orders
Orders
- The defendant is convicted.
- The appropriate fine for the offence is $550,000, reduced by 25% for the plea of guilty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment