Tyler v Marsden Industries [2001] NSWCC 194
The worker's bilateral loss of testes caused severe pain for a limited period after the assault and during and after the surgical procedures, was frightening, left some ongoing discomfort or mild pain, and produced significant emotional distress and impairment of enjoyment of life. Although loss of procreative ability was not a major factor, the loss and its consequences, including lifelong complications, justified compensation assessed at 45 percent of a most extreme case, being $22,500 under s 67.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation Claim for Pain and Suffering Compensation Under S 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 / Determination of Lump Sum Compensation by the Compensation Court
- Outcome
- Award for the applicant worker.
- Legal Topics
- ['lump Sum Compensation' 'pain and Suffering' 'loss of Sexual Organs' 'permanent Impairment' 'assessment of Compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation Claim for Pain and Suffering Compensation Under S 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 / Determination of Lump Sum Compensation by the Compensation Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant worker was entitled to compensation for pain and suffering under s 67 resulting from the loss of his testicles.' 'What amount of compensation was appropriate having regard to the degree and duration of pain and suffering and the severity of the loss.' 'Whether pain and suffering relied upon resulted from the compensable loss rather than merely from the injury or assault.']
Ratio Decidendi
The worker's bilateral loss of testes caused severe pain for a limited period after the assault and during and after the surgical procedures, was frightening, left some ongoing discomfort or mild pain, and produced significant emotional distress and impairment of enjoyment of life. Although loss of procreative ability was not a major factor, the loss and its consequences, including lifelong complications, justified compensation assessed at 45 percent of a most extreme case, being $22,500 under s 67.
Court Disposition
Award for the applicant worker.
Orders
- ['The respondent is to pay the applicant worker $22,500 for pain and suffering.' 'The respondent is to pay the costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment