De Saxe v Mosman Municipal Council [2020] NSWLEC 1512
The Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool and landscaping at 10 Waitovu Street, Mosman, as agreed between the parties at a conciliation conference, being satisfied that jurisdictional prerequisites were met and the parties’ agreement was a decision lawfully available to the Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Marshal de Saxe; Respondent: Mosman Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Local Environmental Plan, Landscaping, Swimming Pool
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marshal de Saxe
Applicant
Mosman Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for construction of an in-ground swimming pool and landscaping
- 2 Whether departures from landscaped area and pool setbacks requirements are reasonable
- 3 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool and landscaping at 10 Waitovu Street, Mosman, as agreed between the parties at a conciliation conference, being satisfied that jurisdictional prerequisites were met and the parties’ agreement was a decision lawfully available to the Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to amend development application 8.2019.81.1 to rely on the amended architectural and landscape plans referred to in the table to condition 1 in Annexure 'A'.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment