Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd [2019] NSWDC 567
The delay in service, though deliberate and not diligent, was relatively short and occurred in the context of a complex, voluminous matter where additional material was awaited and the defendant suffered no real prejudice. Good reason for extension was demonstrated; the order extending time for service stands and both parties' motions to set aside or extend time are dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Extension of Time for Service and Validity of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Order extending time for service confirmed; both sides' motions dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'extension of Time' 'estoppel' 'service of Documents' 'appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Extension of Time for Service and Validity of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs are estopped from appealing the Costs Review Panel's decision after registering judgments and receiving payments" 'Whether the proceedings are invalid due to failure to serve the summons within time under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005' 'Whether there is good reason to extend the time for service of the amended summons']
Ratio Decidendi
The delay in service, though deliberate and not diligent, was relatively short and occurred in the context of a complex, voluminous matter where additional material was awaited and the defendant suffered no real prejudice. Good reason for extension was demonstrated; the order extending time for service stands and both parties' motions to set aside or extend time are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Order extending time for service confirmed; both sides' motions dismissed.
Orders
- ["The Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 30 April 2019 is dismissed." "The Defendant's Notice of Motion filed 15 April 2019 is dismissed." 'The order of the Court made 21 March 2019 extending the time for service of the summons is to remain.' 'The Court will hear the parties as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment