Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 305
There was no allegation in the material before the Court involving Sir Laurence Street, and the applicant did not put any such material before the Court. Having regard to the nature of the application before the Court, no basis was shown for an apprehension of bias on Emmett JA's part, so disqualification was refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Disqualification of Judge
- Outcome
- Application for disqualification refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'judicial Disqualification' 'application for Leave to Appeal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Disqualification of Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Emmett JA should disqualify himself on the basis of apprehended bias because he is related by marriage to Sir Laurence Street.' 'Whether the members of the Court should disqualify themselves and whether special arrangements should be made for appointment of judges from outside New South Wales or international judges.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no allegation in the material before the Court involving Sir Laurence Street, and the applicant did not put any such material before the Court. Having regard to the nature of the application before the Court, no basis was shown for an apprehension of bias on Emmett JA's part, so disqualification was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for disqualification refused.
Orders
- ['Refuse application for disqualification.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment