Martin Thomas CLARK; Charlie RAFFOUL; Wahib FAJLOUN [2019] NSWDC 890

Martin Thomas CLARK; Charlie RAFFOUL; Wahib FAJLOUN [2019] NSWDC 890

Court imposed aggregate prison sentences for each offender, with findings of special circumstances, taking into account objective seriousness, subjective backgrounds, utilitarian discount for guilty pleas, partial concurrency, and aggravating and mitigating factors including remorse, risk of institutionalisation, and past criminal records. The court gave each offender a 25% utilitarian discount, considered the offenders' circumstances individually, and determined the commencement dates of sentences relative to parole periods.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted. Aggregate sentences of imprisonment for each offender with findings of special circumstances.
Legal Topics
['sentence' 'special Circumstances' 'aggravated Detention' 'robbery in Company' 'actual Bodily Harm']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence' 'special Circumstances' 'aggravated Detention' 'robbery in Company' 'actual Bodily Harm']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate sentencing for aggravated detention and robbery in company' 'Assessment of objective and subjective seriousness' 'Application of utilitarian discount' 'Determination of special circumstances' 'Extent of concurrency or accumulation of sentences for offences committed while on parole']

Ratio Decidendi

Court imposed aggregate prison sentences for each offender, with findings of special circumstances, taking into account objective seriousness, subjective backgrounds, utilitarian discount for guilty pleas, partial concurrency, and aggravating and mitigating factors including remorse, risk of institutionalisation, and past criminal records. The court gave each offender a 25% utilitarian discount, considered the offenders' circumstances individually, and determined the commencement dates of sentences relative to parole periods.

Court Disposition

Convicted. Aggregate sentences of imprisonment for each offender with findings of special circumstances.

Orders

  • ['Mr Clark: aggregate term of imprisonment 5 years, non-parole period 3 years 6 months.' 'Mr Raffoul: aggregate term of imprisonment 4 years 6 months, non-parole period 3 years.' 'Mr Fajloun: aggregate term of imprisonment 6 years 3 months, non-parole period 4 years 3 months.' 'Finding of special circumstances for...