Martins Agencies Ltd v Commonwealth Trading Bank & Ors [1986] FCA 216
The agreement amounted to a concluded and sufficiently certain contract for a mortgage, creating an equitable mortgage upon discharge of the prior mortgage. All defendants had constructive notice of the plaintiff's interest. The plaintiff was entitled to priority over subsequent mortgages and entitled to specific performance. Monies received by the Trading Bank at settlement are held on constructive trust for the plaintiff to the extent of the amount due.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martins Agencies Limited; First Defendant: Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia; Second Defendant: Noel Joseph May; Second Defendant: Jacqueline May; Third Defendant: Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia; Counter Claimant: Noel Joseph May; Counter Claimant: Jacqueline May; First Counter Defendant: Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia; Second Counter Defendant: Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia; Third Party: Ivens Francois Buffett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Real Property Dispute; Priorities; Equity; Mortgage; Specific Performance / Post Trial Judgment; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Plaintiff entitled to priority as equitable mortgagee. Counterclaims and third party claim dismissed by consent. Matter stood over for further hearing on form of relief.
- Legal Topics
- Priorities Between Mortgages, Equitable Interests in Land, Notice, Constructive Trust, Specific Performance, Equitable Mortgage, Effect of Conveyancing Ordinance 1913 (norfolk Island)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martins Agencies Limited
Plaintiff
Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia
First Defendant
Noel Joseph May
Second Defendant
Jacqueline May
Second Defendant
Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia
Third Defendant
Noel Joseph May
Counter Claimant
Jacqueline May
Counter Claimant
Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia
First Counter Defendant
Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia
Second Counter Defendant
Ivens Francois Buffett
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Real Property Dispute; Priorities; Equity; Mortgage; Specific Performance / Post Trial Judgment; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether agreement created an equitable mortgage over land in Norfolk Island
- 2 Effect of notice of agreement to grant mortgage on priorities
- 3 Whether equitable interests in land may be created without compliance with Conveyancing Ordinance 1913 (Norfolk Island)
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement amounted to a concluded and sufficiently certain contract for a mortgage, creating an equitable mortgage upon discharge of the prior mortgage. All defendants had constructive notice of the plaintiff's interest. The plaintiff was entitled to priority over subsequent mortgages and entitled to specific performance. Monies received by the Trading Bank at settlement are held on constructive trust for the plaintiff to the extent of the amount due.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff entitled to priority as equitable mortgagee. Counterclaims and third party claim dismissed by consent. Matter stood over for further hearing on form of relief.
Orders
- Plaintiff to file and serve short minutes of order to give effect to reasons for judgment on or before 21 May 1986.
- Defendants to give notice of any desired alterations or additions within seven days of short minutes being filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment