Waldrip v Lake Macquarie City Council and Johnson Property Group Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 1212
The proposal in its current form would result in unacceptable impacts on the vegetation corridor and odour for adjoining residential land, thereby prejudicing future conservation and development objectives under the relevant Plans. However, the development is capable of approval if amended so that the WRF is located in a cleared area on the land, with setbacks enabling a suitable vegetation corridor and buffers, and conditions imposed to ensure ecological and odour management, as well as recycled water balance monitoring.
- Parties
- Applicant: Marvin Waldrip; First Respondent: Lake Macquarie City Council; Second Respondent: Johnson Property Group Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Post Hearing, Final Judgment With Directions for Amendment or Refusal
- Outcome
- Development application not approved in current form; amendments required for approval per judgment findings.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Water Recycling Facility, Environmental Impact, Vegetation Corridor, Odour Impacts, Zone Objectives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marvin Waldrip
Applicant
Lake Macquarie City Council
First Respondent
Johnson Property Group Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Post Hearing, Final Judgment With Directions for Amendment or Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed water recycling facility (WRF) is consistent with applicable zone objectives under the Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plans 2004 and 2014
- 2 Whether the proposal would have unacceptable impacts on odour for adjoining/residential land
- 3 Adequacy and impact of removal of vegetation corridors and threatened species
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal in its current form would result in unacceptable impacts on the vegetation corridor and odour for adjoining residential land, thereby prejudicing future conservation and development objectives under the relevant Plans. However, the development is capable of approval if amended so that the WRF is located in a cleared area on the land, with setbacks enabling a suitable vegetation corridor and buffers, and conditions imposed to ensure ecological and odour management, as well as recycled water balance monitoring.
Court Disposition
Development application not approved in current form; amendments required for approval per judgment findings.
Orders
- Second Respondent to advise if it will amend the application per judgment by 7 June 2016.
- If amended, parties to file agreed directions for amended plans and conditions by 14 June 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment