Marwey v The Queen [1977] HCA 68
The addition of 'reasonably' by the trial judge in reference to 'necessary' in the second paragraph of s.271 did not prejudice the accused and, reading the summing up as a whole, the directions were sufficient. The belief of the accused, on reasonable grounds, in the necessity of the fatal act is definitive; thus, no error warranting interference with the verdict occurred.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal; Appeal
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['self Defence' 'manslaughter' 'interpretation of Criminal Code Queensland S.271']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal; Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury to consider whether the force used was 'reasonably necessary' under s.271, second paragraph, of the Criminal Code (Q.)" "Whether the objective test of reasonableness or the accused's belief on reasonable grounds should be applied under s.271"]
Ratio Decidendi
The addition of 'reasonably' by the trial judge in reference to 'necessary' in the second paragraph of s.271 did not prejudice the accused and, reading the summing up as a whole, the directions were sufficient. The belief of the accused, on reasonable grounds, in the necessity of the fatal act is definitive; thus, no error warranting interference with the verdict occurred.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Special leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment