Anderson v Thompson [2001] NSWADT 11
The respondent's public use of racially abusive language and conduct, observable by others, was held to constitute unlawful racial vilification under sections 20B and 20C of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The acts incited hatred and serious contempt on the ground of the applicant's race. Victimisation was not substantiated on the evidence/referred grounds.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Complaint (racial Vilification and Victimisation) Before Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Racial vilification complaint substantiated; victimisation complaint dismissed; monetary compensation awarded
- Legal Topics
- ['racial Vilification' 'victimisation' 'compensation' 'public Act Definition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Complaint (racial Vilification and Victimisation) Before Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent engaged in unlawful racial vilification under Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 sections 20B and 20C' 'Whether the respondent engaged in unlawful victimisation against the applicant']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's public use of racially abusive language and conduct, observable by others, was held to constitute unlawful racial vilification under sections 20B and 20C of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The acts incited hatred and serious contempt on the ground of the applicant's race. Victimisation was not substantiated on the evidence/referred grounds.
Court Disposition
Racial vilification complaint substantiated; victimisation complaint dismissed; monetary compensation awarded
Orders
- ['Complaint of racial vilification substantiated' 'Complaint of victimisation dismissed' 'Respondent to pay the applicant $5,000 compensation for racial vilification']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment