Dunk v Public Trustee [2003] NSWSC 37

Dunk v Public Trustee [2003] NSWSC 37

The plaintiff was, on the evidence, in a de facto relationship with the deceased at the time of his death and thus an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982. She had been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance and advancement, and is entitled to a legacy of $100,000 from the deceased's estate. The competing beneficiary's claim did not outweigh the plaintiff’s entitlement in the circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Application granted in part; provision ordered for plaintiff.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'de Facto Relationships']
['succession' 'equity'] ['family Provision' 'de Facto Relationships']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim / Final Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether plaintiff was a de facto spouse of the deceased under Family Provision Act 1982 and Property (Relationships) Act 1984' 'Whether plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for proper maintenance, education and advancement in life' "If eligible, what provision is appropriate given the claimant's and beneficiary's competing needs and circumstances"]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was, on the evidence, in a de facto relationship with the deceased at the time of his death and thus an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982. She had been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance and advancement, and is entitled to a legacy of $100,000 from the deceased's estate. The competing beneficiary's claim did not outweigh the plaintiff’s entitlement in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; provision ordered for plaintiff.

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff to receive out of the estate of John Raymond Joseph Donnelly a legacy of $100,000, not to bear interest if paid on or before 25 February 2003, otherwise to bear interest at Supreme Court rates.' "Plaintiff's costs on the party and party basis and defendant's costs on the indemnity basis to be paid out of...