Botterill v Botterill [2000] NSWSC 1152
The amended summons made the matter a proceeding for production of a certificate of title within s 138 of the Real Property Act 1900. The certificate of title had not been produced and was not likely to be produced, and the evidence showed any risk that the defendant would use it improperly was very remote, given the uncertainty that he possessed it, his lack of sophisticated dealings, the lapse of time without any attempted dealing, and his practical abandonment of the property. It was therefore appropriate to order the Registrar General to issue a new certificate of title recording the plaintiff as registered proprietor.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings for Production of a Certificate of Title and Ancillary Order Under S 138 of the Real Property Act 1900 / Final Judgment on Amended Summons
- Outcome
- Application granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['torrens Title' 'certificate of Title' 'registrar General' 'matrimonial Property Transfer' 'real Property Act 1900 S 138']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings for Production of a Certificate of Title and Ancillary Order Under S 138 of the Real Property Act 1900 / Final Judgment on Amended Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended proceedings were proceedings for production of a certificate of title in which an order under s 138 of the Real Property Act 1900 could be made.' 'Whether the evidence justified ordering the Registrar General to issue a new certificate of title despite the missing existing certificate of title.' 'Whether the risk to the integrity of the Torrens register from a possible certificate of title at large was sufficiently remote.' 'Whether service of the amended summons should be dispensed with.']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended summons made the matter a proceeding for production of a certificate of title within s 138 of the Real Property Act 1900. The certificate of title had not been produced and was not likely to be produced, and the evidence showed any risk that the defendant would use it improperly was very remote, given the uncertainty that he possessed it, his lack of sophisticated dealings, the lapse of time without any attempted dealing, and his practical abandonment of the property. It was therefore appropriate to order the Registrar General to issue a new certificate of title recording the plaintiff as registered proprietor.
Court Disposition
Application granted.
Orders
- ['Service of the amended summons dispensed with.' 'The Registrar General is to issue a new certificate of title to the land comprised in Certificate of Title Folio Identifier 20/6506 recording Mary Jane Botterill as the registered proprietor.' "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment