Metledge v Bambakit [2004] NSWSC 176

Metledge v Bambakit [2004] NSWSC 176

Bambakit Pty Ltd was unable to demonstrate solvency in the statutory sense, having failed to pay the debt claimed in the statutory demand and facing circumstances where its main assets and financing arrangements would not assure payment of debts as and when due. No sufficient factual basis was established for...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Proceeding / Review of Registrar's Decision; Judgment
Outcome
Registrar's decision set aside; winding up order made; liquidator appointed.
Legal Topics
['winding Up' 'corporate Insolvency']
['corporations Law' 'equity'] ['winding Up' 'corporate Insolvency']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Proceeding / Review of Registrar's Decision; Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Bambakit Pty Ltd is insolvent within the meaning of Corporations Act s 95A(1)' 'Whether there are grounds for winding up on just and equitable basis under s 461(1)(k)']

Ratio Decidendi

Bambakit Pty Ltd was unable to demonstrate solvency in the statutory sense, having failed to pay the debt claimed in the statutory demand and facing circumstances where its main assets and financing arrangements would not assure payment of debts as and when due. No sufficient factual basis was established for winding up on the just and equitable ground.

Court Disposition

Registrar's decision set aside; winding up order made; liquidator appointed.

Orders

  • ["Registrar's orders set aside" 'Bambakit Pty Ltd to be wound up in insolvency' 'Liquidator to be appointed to Bambakit Pty Ltd']