Morton, M. v Black, D.R. [1986] FCA 338

Morton, M. v Black, D.R. [1986] FCA 338

No new grounds were presented to justify ex parte relief or further restraint; the Court refused to intrude on matters before the Supreme Court, particularly regarding the contempt issue and status of caveats.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Mary Morton; Respondent: Donald Ross Black; Other: Mr Wiasak
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 July 1986
Procedural Posture
Application for Ex Parte Relief / Interlocutory, Ex Parte Application
Outcome
ex parte relief refused
Legal Topics
Caveats, Ex Parte Relief, Interlocutory Injunctions
Property Law Caveats Ex Parte Relief Interlocutory Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Morton

Applicant

Donald Ross Black

Respondent

Mr Wiasak

Other

Procedural Posture

Application for Ex Parte Relief / Interlocutory, Ex Parte Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ex parte relief should be granted to restrain Supreme Court proceedings regarding caveat removal and alleged contempt

Ratio Decidendi

No new grounds were presented to justify ex parte relief or further restraint; the Court refused to intrude on matters before the Supreme Court, particularly regarding the contempt issue and status of caveats.

Court Disposition

ex parte relief refused

Orders

  • Ex parte relief sought by applicants is refused.