Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 135
The characterisation of the proposed development as a 'general store' was a factual question for Council under the relevant planning instruments; this decision was reasonably open to Council on the evidence and material before it, thus the applicant's judicial review must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'characterisation of Land Use' 'general Store Definition' 'jurisdictional Fact' 'costs (indemnity and Party Party)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development is a general store permissible under planning instruments' 'Whether characterisation of development is a jurisdictional fact' "Whether Council's decision was reasonably open"]
Ratio Decidendi
The characterisation of the proposed development as a 'general store' was a factual question for Council under the relevant planning instruments; this decision was reasonably open to Council on the evidence and material before it, thus the applicant's judicial review must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The applicant's class 4 application is dismissed." 'The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the First Respondent and the Second Respondent, on a party-party basis, in amounts to be agreed or assessed according to law.' 'Order 2 is stayed for 21 days pending any Notice of Motion regarding costs.' 'All exhibits...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment