Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 135

Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 135

The characterisation of the proposed development as a 'general store' was a factual question for Council under the relevant planning instruments; this decision was reasonably open to Council on the evidence and material before it, thus the applicant's judicial review must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['development Consent' 'characterisation of Land Use' 'general Store Definition' 'jurisdictional Fact' 'costs (indemnity and Party Party)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the proposed development is a general store permissible under planning instruments' 'Whether characterisation of development is a jurisdictional fact' "Whether Council's decision was reasonably open"]

Ratio Decidendi

The characterisation of the proposed development as a 'general store' was a factual question for Council under the relevant planning instruments; this decision was reasonably open to Council on the evidence and material before it, thus the applicant's judicial review must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ["The applicant's class 4 application is dismissed." 'The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the First Respondent and the Second Respondent, on a party-party basis, in amounts to be agreed or assessed according to law.' 'Order 2 is stayed for 21 days pending any Notice of Motion regarding costs.' 'All exhibits...