Maryland Development Company v Penrith City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1598

Maryland Development Company v Penrith City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1598

The appeal was upheld and development application approved because the parties' agreement lawfully disposed of the proceedings, all statutory and planning prerequisites were met, and the Court was required to make orders reflecting the agreement reached under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Class 1 Appeal Resolved After Conciliation Conference With Agreement Between the Parties
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'integrated Development' 'remediation of Land' 'conciliation Conference' 'appeal Against Deemed Refusal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Development Appeal / Class 1 Appeal Resolved After Conciliation Conference With Agreement Between the Parties

  1. 1 ['Whether the development application for roadworks should be approved subject to conditions' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for grant of consent exist under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and planning instruments']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was upheld and development application approved because the parties' agreement lawfully disposed of the proceedings, all statutory and planning prerequisites were met, and the Court was required to make orders reflecting the agreement reached under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions

Orders

  • ["The Applicant is granted leave to amend its application and the plans filed with the Court on 7 November 2018, by plans and information provided to the Respondent on 11 July 2019 in accordance with the schedule of plans enclosed and annexed to the conditions at Annexure 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development...