Amiri v R [2017] NSWCCA 157
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the sentencing judge’s assessment of objective seriousness was affected by error or that the sentence was manifestly excessive; the original findings and sentence were open and supported on the facts and applicable sentencing principles given the applicant’s persistent...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'attempted Drug and Firearm Possession' 'objective Seriousness' 'manifest Excess' 'gang Related Offences']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of the offending' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the sentencing judge’s assessment of objective seriousness was affected by error or that the sentence was manifestly excessive; the original findings and sentence were open and supported on the facts and applicable sentencing principles given the applicant’s persistent efforts, association with a notorious criminal gang, and the scale of the offending.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment