Malco & Ors -V- Massaris & Ors [1998] NSWEOT

Malco & Ors -V- Massaris & Ors [1998] NSWEOT

The article did not incite hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule within the meaning of s.20C(1); individual expressions and cumulative content were protected as fair report or reasonable comment on a public act under s.20C(2)(a),(c); Macedonians constitute a race for the purposes of the Act, but the article's content fell within defences, and no direct link between the article and subsequent hate incidents was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Anti Discrimination Complaint / Judgment After Final Hearing
Outcome
Complaint dismissed; judgment for the respondents.
Legal Topics
['racial Vilification' 'freedom of Expression' 'defences to Vilification' "meaning of 'race' Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw)"]
['anti Discrimination Law'] ['racial Vilification' 'freedom of Expression' 'defences to Vilification' "meaning of 'race' Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw)"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Anti Discrimination Complaint / Judgment After Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the publication of an article in the O Kosmos newspaper constituted racial vilification under s.20C of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)' "Whether the term 'Skopjan' and related references were likely to incite hatred, serious contempt, or severe ridicule of Macedonians" 'Whether Macedonians constitute a race within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act' 'Whether the article was protected as a fair report/comment under s.20C(2)(a),(c) of the Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The article did not incite hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule within the meaning of s.20C(1); individual expressions and cumulative content were protected as fair report or reasonable comment on a public act under s.20C(2)(a),(c); Macedonians constitute a race for the purposes of the Act, but the article's content fell within defences, and no direct link between the article and subsequent hate incidents was established.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed; judgment for the respondents.

Orders

  • ['Complaint against Mr Kaldis dismissed under s.111(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)' 'Costs awarded to Mr Kaldis under s.111(2) of the Act' "Applicants' claims against remaining respondents dismissed"]