Saroa v Reckon Australia Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1879

The applicant failed to demonstrate any merit in the proposed appeal or any reason to justify an extension of time; therefore, the application for leave to appeal out of time was refused.

Parties: Applicant: Mataio Saroa; Respondent: Reckon Australia Pty Limited
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 10 December 1999
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome: application refused
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Costs Orders

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Out of Time Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mataio Saroa

Applicant

Reckon Australia Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether leave should be granted to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time against a costs order

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate any merit in the proposed appeal or any reason to justify an extension of time; therefore, the application for leave to appeal out of time was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

The application is refused.
The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs.