R v King [1999] NSWCCA 251
The sentencing judge erred in not finding special circumstances given the cumulative sentences imposed, the applicant's psychological needs and youth, and the need for supervision on parole; accordingly, the sentence should be quashed and replaced with sentences reflecting these special circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Sentence quashed. New sentences imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'special Circumstances' 'malicious Wounding' 'infliction of Grievous Bodily Harm' 'cumulative Sentences' 'rehabilitation' 'parole Eligibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in not finding special circumstances justifying a shorter non-parole period and longer period on parole' 'Whether the proportion between the minimum and additional terms was inappropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in not finding special circumstances given the cumulative sentences imposed, the applicant's psychological needs and youth, and the need for supervision on parole; accordingly, the sentence should be quashed and replaced with sentences reflecting these special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Sentence quashed. New sentences imposed.
Orders
- ['Sentence for first offence: fixed term of twelve months from 10 November 1997 to 9 November 1998.' 'Sentence for second offence: cumulative minimum term of fifteen months from 10 November 1998 to 9 February 2000.' 'Additional term of fifteen months from 10 February 2000.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment