Martin v The Hills Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 1304
Because owner consent had been provided, contamination had been considered with no further investigation warranted, the driveway was permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone and did not breach relevant development standards, submissions had been considered, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified, the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions; the Court therefore disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application 1236/2019/ZA approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'driveway and Drainage Works' 'consent Orders' 'land Contamination' 'zoning and Permissibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal against refusal of Development Application No. 1236/2019/ZA should be upheld by agreement between the parties.' 'Whether the agreed decision to grant development consent subject to conditions was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because owner consent had been provided, contamination had been considered with no further investigation warranted, the driveway was permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone and did not breach relevant development standards, submissions had been considered, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified, the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions; the Court therefore disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application 1236/2019/ZA approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application 1236/2019/ZA for partial demolition of an existing retaining wall, removal of two trees and construction of a reinforced concrete driveway and laying of pre-provisioning service utility conduits from 48 Green Road, Kellyville (Lot C DP 354263) to Carlisle Crescent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment