Aguis v Forrester [2008] NSWLEC 1434
The tree in question has caused damage to the applicant's property and is likely, in the near future, to cause further damage and injury due to the condition of specific branches, and therefore meets the statutory criteria for an order; intervention is warranted, specifically the removal and pruning of certain branches, with costs shared equally.
- Parties
- Applicant: Maurice Aguis; Respondent: Isabel Forrester
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld
- Legal Topics
- Trees (neighbours), Damage to Property, Injury to Person, Pruning of Trees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maurice Aguis
Applicant
Isabel Forrester
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Lemon Scented Gum tree has caused or is likely to cause damage to neighbour's property
- 2 Whether the tree is likely to cause injury to any person
- 3 Appropriate orders for pruning or removal under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tree in question has caused damage to the applicant's property and is likely, in the near future, to cause further damage and injury due to the condition of specific branches, and therefore meets the statutory criteria for an order; intervention is warranted, specifically the removal and pruning of certain branches, with costs shared equally.
Court Disposition
Application upheld
Orders
- The northern trunk of the tree and two poor condition branches on the southern trunk to be pruned by 28 February 2009.
- Costs of the works to be shared equally by Mr Aguis and Mrs Forrester.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment