Roselli v Strathfield Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 336
The proposed two-storey dwelling house, being of fundamentally different architectural style and two-storey scale at the building line, is not compatible with the predominant character of Merley Road's streetscape, contrary to the objectives and requirements in the relevant planning instruments and control plans. The development would introduce an inappropriate contrast, detracting from the quality of the streetscape.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mauro Roselli; Respondent: Strathfield Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Streetscape, Architectural Character, Compatibility, Residential Zoning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mauro Roselli
Applicant
Strathfield Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed two-storey dwelling is appropriate in the Merley Road streetscape given height, bulk, scale, and architectural character requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed two-storey dwelling house, being of fundamentally different architectural style and two-storey scale at the building line, is not compatible with the predominant character of Merley Road's streetscape, contrary to the objectives and requirements in the relevant planning instruments and control plans. The development would introduce an inappropriate contrast, detracting from the quality of the streetscape.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development Application No. 0304/466 for the demolition of existing buildings and the erection of a two-storey dwelling house at 31 Merley Road, Strathfield, is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment