Re Edelsten, G.W. v. Donnelly, M.C. & Ors [1988] FCA 229
Answers given by Mrs Edelsten in public examination under s.81 of the Bankruptcy Act do not constitute dissemination to the public under s.121(1) of the Family Law Act; there is no risk of contravening s.121(1), so evidence need not be taken in camera.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application for Directions on Scope of Witness Examination and Adjournment
- Outcome
- Examination of Mrs Leanne Edelsten adjourned for further hearing before the Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- ['examination of Spouse of Bankrupt' 'interaction of Family Law Act S.121 With Bankruptcy Act S.81' 'publication of Court Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application for Directions on Scope of Witness Examination and Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether answers given by Mrs Leanne Edelsten in public examination under s.81 of the Bankruptcy Act might breach s.121(1) of the Family Law Act' 'Whether examination may or should be conducted in camera despite s.81(2) of Bankruptcy Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Answers given by Mrs Edelsten in public examination under s.81 of the Bankruptcy Act do not constitute dissemination to the public under s.121(1) of the Family Law Act; there is no risk of contravening s.121(1), so evidence need not be taken in camera.
Court Disposition
Examination of Mrs Leanne Edelsten adjourned for further hearing before the Registrar.
Orders
- ['The examination of Leanne Edelsten under s.81 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 be adjourned for further hearing before the Registrar on a date to be fixed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment