Richards v Patras Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 380
Given the indication of possible adverse fiscal consequences for shareholders and the prospect of cost savings through mediation, the Court exercised its discretion to refer the matter to mediation by a registrar, despite opposition from the defendants.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Max Raymond Richards; First Defendant: Patras Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Richards Milling Co Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Richards Grazing Co Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Cyrill Richards; Fifth Defendant: Warren Harvey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Winding Up / Interlocutory Hearing; Orders for Mediation and Directions
- Outcome
- Application for mediation granted; matter stood over for directions.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up of Companies, Shareholder Disputes, Court Directed Mediation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Max Raymond Richards
Plaintiff
Patras Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Richards Milling Co Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Richards Grazing Co Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Cyrill Richards
Fourth Defendant
Warren Harvey
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Winding Up / Interlocutory Hearing; Orders for Mediation and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should direct the parties to undertake mediation under Order 72 of the Federal Court Rules despite opposition
- 2 Whether winding up of Patras Pty Ltd should proceed given alleged adverse fiscal consequences for shareholders
Ratio Decidendi
Given the indication of possible adverse fiscal consequences for shareholders and the prospect of cost savings through mediation, the Court exercised its discretion to refer the matter to mediation by a registrar, despite opposition from the defendants.
Court Disposition
Application for mediation granted; matter stood over for directions.
Orders
- Leave granted to file Notice of Motion and Affidavit of Stephen Woodward
- Proceeding listed for directions on 24 April 2009
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment