Maximo Armando Pantoja v R [2025] NSWCCA 10
The aggregate sentence, while severe and possibly higher than might be imposed by some other judges, fell within the discretionary range available in the circumstances. The objective and subjective circumstances, including the deliberate conduct, lack of consent, duration, domestic relationship context and the applicant's history of serious domestic violence, supported the sentence imposed and did not reveal error or manifest excess.
- Parties
- Applicant: Maximo Armando Pantoja; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Objective Seriousness, Comparable Cases, Aggregate Sentences, Aggravating Factors, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maximo Armando Pantoja
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the indicative sentence for Count 3 was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence, while severe and possibly higher than might be imposed by some other judges, fell within the discretionary range available in the circumstances. The objective and subjective circumstances, including the deliberate conduct, lack of consent, duration, domestic relationship context and the applicant's history of serious domestic violence, supported the sentence imposed and did not reveal error or manifest excess.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal
- Dismiss the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment