Maxim’s Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450

Maxim’s Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450

Given Maxim’s substantial Hong Kong assets, the straightforward enforceability of any costs order in Hong Kong, and Maxim’s undertaking not to seek its own security for costs in Hong Kong, security for costs is ordered only to the amount of estimated enforcement costs ($15,000), not for full costs as the respondent sought.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs in Appeal Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision on Motion for Security for Costs
Outcome
Application granted in part; security for costs ordered limited to $15,000; respondent’s motion otherwise dismissed; costs of motion to be costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'enforcement of Foreign Judgments' 'federal Court Procedure']
['practice and Procedure'] ['security for Costs' 'enforcement of Foreign Judgments' 'federal Court Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Security for Costs in Appeal Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision on Motion for Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against a foreign-resident applicant with no assets in Australia' 'Whether security should be limited to the estimated costs of enforcement in Hong Kong']

Ratio Decidendi

Given Maxim’s substantial Hong Kong assets, the straightforward enforceability of any costs order in Hong Kong, and Maxim’s undertaking not to seek its own security for costs in Hong Kong, security for costs is ordered only to the amount of estimated enforcement costs ($15,000), not for full costs as the respondent sought.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; security for costs ordered limited to $15,000; respondent’s motion otherwise dismissed; costs of motion to be costs in the cause.

Orders

  • ['Applicant to provide $15,000 as security for respondent’s costs, by payment into a jointly controlled interest-bearing account at an Australian owned bank within 14 days.' 'Security to be held pursuant to the attached undertaking by solicitors for the parties.' 'Respondent’s notice of motion dated 21 April 2010...