Armour v Mason [2002] NSWSC 464
Plaintiffs, having become bankrupt after entry of judgment, lacked standing to apply for enforcement; however, the Court may direct compliance with its previous order on its own motion to ensure obligations established by the judgment are discharged.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Equity / Post Judgment Enforcement
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; Court on its own motion directs the defendants to ensure compliance with previous order.
- Legal Topics
- ['effect of Bankruptcy on Proceedings' 'enforcement of Court Orders' 'transfer of Lease' 'standing of Bankrupts']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application in Equity / Post Judgment Enforcement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether bankrupts are competent to apply for enforcement of a Court order made prior to their bankruptcy' 'Whether the Court may direct compliance with a previous order on its own motion']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs, having become bankrupt after entry of judgment, lacked standing to apply for enforcement; however, the Court may direct compliance with its previous order on its own motion to ensure obligations established by the judgment are discharged.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; Court on its own motion directs the defendants to ensure compliance with previous order.
Orders
- ["Plaintiffs' application dismissed." 'Defendants directed to exercise their best endeavours and take all relevant steps to ensure the executed transfer of lease is duly completed and registered.' 'No order as to costs in respect of the application.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment