Raine -v- Marshall [2001] NSWADT 143

Raine -v- Marshall [2001] NSWADT 143

The correspondence from the respondent and his solicitors did not unequivocally exercise the option to renew the lease; there was no clear statement of intention to exercise the option. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to possession of the retail part of the premises.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Claim for Surrender of Possession of Premises / Principal Matter
Outcome
Applicant entitled to possession of retail part of premises from 9 October 2001; further hearing permitted to determine occupation fee; no order for costs.
Legal Topics
['exercise of Option to Renew Lease' 'right to Possession of Premises' 'repair Obligations Under Lease']
['retail Leases'] ['exercise of Option to Renew Lease' 'right to Possession of Premises' 'repair Obligations Under Lease']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Claim for Surrender of Possession of Premises / Principal Matter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondent validly exercised the option to renew the lease' 'Whether the applicant is entitled to possession of the premises' 'Responsibility for structural repairs']

Ratio Decidendi

The correspondence from the respondent and his solicitors did not unequivocally exercise the option to renew the lease; there was no clear statement of intention to exercise the option. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to possession of the retail part of the premises.

Court Disposition

Applicant entitled to possession of retail part of premises from 9 October 2001; further hearing permitted to determine occupation fee; no order for costs.

Orders

  • ['Applicant entitled to possession of retail part of the premises on and from 9 October 2001' 'Leave for further hearing to establish occupation fee for retail part' 'No order for costs, no special circumstances']