Kyi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 580
The Tribunal was not obliged to make findings on facts it considered would not amount to persecution even if established, and it applied the correct legal principles regarding the definition of persecution and materiality under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). No error of law or failure to observe statutory procedures was identified.
- Parties
- Applicant: May Htwe Kyi; Respondent: The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment; Application Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visas, Refugee Law, Judicial Review, Tribunal Findings, Persecution, Well Founded Fear
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
May Htwe Kyi
Applicant
The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Final Judgment; Application Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to set out findings on material questions of fact as required by s 430(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the Tribunal committed an error of law in assessing what constitutes persecution under the Refugees Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not obliged to make findings on facts it considered would not amount to persecution even if established, and it applied the correct legal principles regarding the definition of persecution and materiality under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). No error of law or failure to observe statutory procedures was identified.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment