Mayfield Development Corporation Pty Ltd v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 745
Application for discovery by non-parties is premature and inconsistent with s 83 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as no defence has been filed and no issues have been joined on the pleadings; discovery cannot meet the requirements of relevance under Federal Court Rules.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mayfield Development Corporation Pty Ltd; First Respondent: NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Port Botany Operations Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Port Kembla Operations Pty Ltd; Interested Person: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission; Interested Person: Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Limited; Interested Person: Port of Newcastle Investments (Property) Pty Limited; Interested Person: Port of Newcastle Investments Pty Limited; Interested Person: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Discovery by Non Parties During Stay
- Outcome
- Application for discovery dismissed; leave granted for filing amended originating application and amended statement of claim; costs ordered forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Stay of Proceedings, Civil Penalty Proceedings, Section 83 Competition and Consumer Act, Federal Court Rules R 20.11 and R 20.23
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mayfield Development Corporation Pty Ltd
Applicant
NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Port Botany Operations Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Port Kembla Operations Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
Interested Person
Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Limited
Interested Person
Port of Newcastle Investments (Property) Pty Limited
Interested Person
Port of Newcastle Investments Pty Limited
Interested Person
State of New South Wales
Interested Person
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Discovery by Non Parties During Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether application for discovery by non-parties should be granted during stay of proceeding
- 2 Whether application is premature given no defence filed
- 3 Whether discovery meets the requirements of relevance under Federal Court Rules
Ratio Decidendi
Application for discovery by non-parties is premature and inconsistent with s 83 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as no defence has been filed and no issues have been joined on the pleadings; discovery cannot meet the requirements of relevance under Federal Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Application for discovery dismissed; leave granted for filing amended originating application and amended statement of claim; costs ordered forthwith.
Orders
- Stay varied to permit filing and service of amended originating application and amended statement of claim.
- Respondents are not obliged to take steps in response to amended documents until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment