MAZIA V. BRITISH INSULATED CALLENDER'S CABLES (AUST.) PTY. LTD. AND ANOTHER

MAZIA V. BRITISH INSULATED CALLENDER'S CABLES (AUST.) PTY. LTD. AND ANOTHER

There was no evidence capable of supporting a finding by a jury of negligence by the driver Claxton; the driver's view was likely obscured by a truck, and there was no positive evidence that the driver saw or ought to have seen the appellant in time to avoid the accident. The trial judge was correct to withdraw the case from the jury and direct a verdict for the respondents.

Parties
Appellant: Mazia; First Respondent: British Insulated Callenders Cables (Australia) Pty Limited; Second Respondent: Claxton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 June 1963
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment in High Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mazia

Appellant

British Insulated Callenders Cables (Australia) Pty Limited

First Respondent

Claxton

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment in High Court

  1. 1 Whether there was evidence of negligence by Claxton, the driver, sufficient to go to the jury
  2. 2 Whether a verdict should have been directed for the respondents at the close of appellant's case

Ratio Decidendi

There was no evidence capable of supporting a finding by a jury of negligence by the driver Claxton; the driver's view was likely obscured by a truck, and there was no positive evidence that the driver saw or ought to have seen the appellant in time to avoid the accident. The trial judge was correct to withdraw the case from the jury and direct a verdict for the respondents.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed with costs