MBR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 492
Because the appellant failed to attend the hearing and affidavits established that the appellant had left the country, it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal under section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal in a Migration Matter / On Appeal From a Decision of Federal Magistrate Scarlett Dismissing an Application for Review of a Decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['class 816 Special Permanent Entry Permit' 'immigration Review Tribunal Decision' 'failure to Attend Hearing' 'dismissal Under Section 25(2 B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in a Migration Matter / On Appeal From a Decision of Federal Magistrate Scarlett Dismissing an Application for Review of a Decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed under section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) because the appellant failed to attend the hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellant failed to attend the hearing and affidavits established that the appellant had left the country, it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal under section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed pursuant to section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth).' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment