McNAULTY V. PATERSON & ORS. 7/1945

McNAULTY V. PATERSON & ORS. 7/1945

The agreement created a partnership in respect of operations at Finnie only, but not in relation to the business conducted by McAnulty at South Brisbane. McAnulty was neither under a contractual nor fiduciary duty to account for profits made at South Brisbane except in relation to specific orders obtained by use of the Finnie connection, namely the 12,000 cases meat and vegetable rations order and profits from 'minced beef loaf' (minced pack) which were within the scope of the original adventure. Consent and knowledge by the syndicate of McAnulty's external business excused him from a general account; the contract allowed him freedom to refrain from operating Finnie, and to operate...

Parties
Appellant: McAnulty; Respondents: Paterson & Ors
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 October 1946
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal allowed in part; judgment of the Supreme Court varied.
Legal Topics
Fiduciary Duties, Partnerships—existence and Scope, Breach of Contract, Account of Profits
Equity Contract Partnership Fiduciary Duties Partnerships—existence and Scope Breach of Contract Account of Profits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

McAnulty

Appellant

Paterson & Ors

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the relationship between McAnulty and the syndicate (Paterson & Ors) constituted a partnership regarding the Finnie works business.
  2. 2 Whether McAnulty was under a fiduciary obligation to account for profits made from the South Brisbane factory due to his connection with the Finnie works and the syndicate.
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of contract by McAnulty in not operating the Finnie works and instead conducting similar business elsewhere.

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement created a partnership in respect of operations at Finnie only, but not in relation to the business conducted by McAnulty at South Brisbane. McAnulty was neither under a contractual nor fiduciary duty to account for profits made at South Brisbane except in relation to specific orders obtained by use of the Finnie connection, namely the 12,000 cases meat and vegetable rations order and profits from 'minced beef loaf' (minced pack) which were within the scope of the original adventure. Consent and knowledge by the syndicate of McAnulty's external business excused him from a general account; the contract allowed him freedom to refrain from operating Finnie, and to operate...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal allowed in part; judgment of the Supreme Court varied.

Orders

  • First and third declarations in the Supreme Court judgment ordering account of South Brisbane business omitted.
  • Account of Finnie business profits to exclude self-dealing by McAnulty (i.e., not treated as purchase by McAnulty of Finnie goods).