McCallum & Co Pty Ltd v Allen Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 673

McCallum & Co Pty Ltd v Allen Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 673

The application for a stay was dismissed as Harper failed to advance a case for a stay, having not taken steps towards any High Court application or faced imminent orders directly causing him to pay money.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion / Application for Stay of Proceedings After Appeal
Outcome
notice of motion dismissed, applicant on the motion to pay costs
Legal Topics
['stay of Proceedings' 'registered Design' 'injunction' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Motion / Application for Stay of Proceedings After Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether a stay of proceedings should be granted following unsuccessful appeal' 'Whether the applicant for stay has established grounds for a stay']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for a stay was dismissed as Harper failed to advance a case for a stay, having not taken steps towards any High Court application or faced imminent orders directly causing him to pay money.

Court Disposition

notice of motion dismissed, applicant on the motion to pay costs

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion is dismissed.' 'The applicant on the motion pay the costs of the respondent to the motion.']