McClymont v Hooper [1973] HCA 2

McClymont v Hooper [1973] HCA 2

The will, properly construed in light of its language and surrounding circumstances, gave Peter Edward Hooper the corpus of the residuary estate at least upon his attaining twenty-one years. The will dealt with the whole residuary estate, named no other beneficiary, created a trust during the nephew's minority, and a contrary construction would produce an intestacy inconsistent with the testatrix's evident intention. The respondent was therefore beneficially entitled and the appeal was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Construction of a Will and Entitlement to a Residuary Estate / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From Answers Given on an Originating Summons in the Supreme Court of Victoria
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['construction of Wills' 'residuary Estate' 'testamentary Trust' 'intestacy' 'implied Gift of Corpus' 'minor Beneficiary Attaining Majority']
['succession' 'trusts' 'probate'] ['construction of Wills' 'residuary Estate' 'testamentary Trust' 'intestacy' 'implied Gift of Corpus' 'minor Beneficiary Attaining Majority']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Concerning Construction of a Will and Entitlement to a Residuary Estate / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From Answers Given on an Originating Summons in the Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether, on the proper construction of the will, Peter Edward Hooper was beneficially entitled to the deceased's estate after payment of debts, expenses and duties." 'Whether the words "until he attains the age of twenty-one years" qualified the trust for the nephew or instead qualified the trustee\'s powers.' 'If the words qualified the trust for the nephew, whether the will nevertheless gave the nephew the corpus of the residuary estate at least upon attaining twenty-one years, avoiding intestacy.']

Ratio Decidendi

The will, properly construed in light of its language and surrounding circumstances, gave Peter Edward Hooper the corpus of the residuary estate at least upon his attaining twenty-one years. The will dealt with the whole residuary estate, named no other beneficiary, created a trust during the nephew's minority, and a contrary construction would produce an intestacy inconsistent with the testatrix's evident intention. The respondent was therefore beneficially entitled and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']