McIvor v Watson [1960] HCA 43
An execution for costs ordered in connection with a proceeding for an offence is not an execution in a 'civil proceeding' under s. 52(e) of the Bankruptcy Act, even if the order for costs is enforced through a civil court as per s. 121 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act; thus, the act of bankruptcy was not made out and the sequestration order could not stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of sequestration set aside.
- Legal Topics
- ['act of Bankruptcy' 'enforcement of Costs' 'civil Versus Criminal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether execution to enforce costs awarded in a criminal proceeding constitutes an act of bankruptcy under s. 52(e) of the Bankruptcy Act 1924-1958 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
An execution for costs ordered in connection with a proceeding for an offence is not an execution in a 'civil proceeding' under s. 52(e) of the Bankruptcy Act, even if the order for costs is enforced through a civil court as per s. 121 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act; thus, the act of bankruptcy was not made out and the sequestration order could not stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of sequestration set aside.
Orders
- ['The appeal allowed with costs.' 'Order of sequestration set aside.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment