McKELLAR v BLAKE [1998] NSWCA 153
The trial judge failed to make a finding that, on the balance of probabilities, the respondent would not have undergone the operation if adequately warned. The finding that her decision 'might have been different' does not establish the necessary causal link. Therefore, the verdict for the respondent cannot stand.
- Parties
- Appellant: McKellar; Respondent: Blake
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; verdict and judgment for respondent set aside; judgment entered for the appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Warn, Informed Consent, Causation in Medical Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
McKellar
Appellant
Blake
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge made a sufficient finding to establish causation between the failure to adequately warn the patient and the resultant condition
- 2 Whether the respondent would have undergone the operation if fully informed of the risks
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge failed to make a finding that, on the balance of probabilities, the respondent would not have undergone the operation if adequately warned. The finding that her decision 'might have been different' does not establish the necessary causal link. Therefore, the verdict for the respondent cannot stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; verdict and judgment for respondent set aside; judgment entered for the appellant.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The verdict and judgment of the District Court are set aside and judgment entered for the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment