McMillan Investment Holdings Pty Ltd v Mangos [2022] NSWSC 1399
The documents sought in the disputed paragraphs of the subpoenas are relevant to the pleaded issues and may be relevant to cross-examination of the parties, especially as to credibility and shadow directorship. No evidence of oppression was provided. The subpoenas (disputed paragraphs) should not be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory (application to Set Aside Subpoena/order to Produce)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; subpoenas to be complied with; costs to defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'setting Aside Subpoena' 'apparent Relevance' 'oppression' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (application to Set Aside Subpoena/order to Produce)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the disputed paragraphs of the subpoenas should be set aside on the basis of lack of apparent relevance or oppression.']
Ratio Decidendi
The documents sought in the disputed paragraphs of the subpoenas are relevant to the pleaded issues and may be relevant to cross-examination of the parties, especially as to credibility and shadow directorship. No evidence of oppression was provided. The subpoenas (disputed paragraphs) should not be set aside.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; subpoenas to be complied with; costs to defendants.
Orders
- ['The notice of motion filed 28 March 2019 is dismissed.' 'The documents in answer to the disputed paragraphs of the subpoena should be produced to the Court in 14 days. The disputed paragraphs are: Paragraph 1 of the schedule of the subpoenas addressed to Julie McMillan and Ian McMillan, DJ Advisory and Mr Warner...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment