Alam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 278

Alam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 278

The applicant identified no substantiated error of law and no ground under section 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) upon which the Court could interfere with the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings; the Tribunal's decision therefore had to be affirmed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 March 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Final Orders
Outcome
The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal was affirmed and the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'judicial Review' 'error of Law' 'credibility Findings' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 476']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Final Orders

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal made an error of law in affirming the refusal of a protection visa.' "Whether any ground under section 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) permitted the Court to interfere with the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant identified no substantiated error of law and no ground under section 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) upon which the Court could interfere with the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings; the Tribunal's decision therefore had to be affirmed.

Court Disposition

The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal was affirmed and the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

  • ['The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal be affirmed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the respondent.']