ME v R [2012] NSWCCA 237
The victim's contemporaneous recognition that the men who attacked him were the same men with whom he had spoken and walked seconds earlier was sufficient for the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. The matters relied on by the applicant did not impugn that recognition evidence, and the CCTV evidence did not raise a reasonable alternative hypothesis involving other persons.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unreasonable Verdict' 'identification Evidence' 'recognition Evidence' 'robbery in Company Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the jury's verdict was unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence." 'Whether the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that ME was one of the persons who attacked the victim.']
Ratio Decidendi
The victim's contemporaneous recognition that the men who attacked him were the same men with whom he had spoken and walked seconds earlier was sufficient for the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. The matters relied on by the applicant did not impugn that recognition evidence, and the CCTV evidence did not raise a reasonable alternative hypothesis involving other persons.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment