Gaffney v Ward [2014] NSWDC 20

Gaffney v Ward [2014] NSWDC 20

The plaintiff is entitled to substantial damages for economic loss resulting from severe psychological injury sustained due to nervous shock upon learning of her children's injuries in a motor vehicle accident, which caused permanent incapacity for her operatic career and impaired teaching capacity. The assessment utilises statutory and common law criteria for loss of earning capacity, applies conventional discounts for vicissitudes, and global buffer for future loss where quantification is inherently imprecise due to professional uncertainties. Defendant's arguments regarding pre-existing vulnerabilities and caregiving responsibilities do not sufficiently diminish plaintiff's entitlement...

Parties
Plaintiff: Meagan Gaffney; Defendant: David Ward
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident, Nervous Shock, Assessment of Damages, Economic Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity
Torts Damages Motor Vehicle Accident Nervous Shock Assessment of Damages Economic Loss Loss of Earning Capacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meagan Gaffney

Plaintiff

David Ward

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Quantification of damages for nervous shock
  2. 2 Assessment of economic loss and loss of earning capacity
  3. 3 Causation and scope of the plaintiff's loss

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is entitled to substantial damages for economic loss resulting from severe psychological injury sustained due to nervous shock upon learning of her children's injuries in a motor vehicle accident, which caused permanent incapacity for her operatic career and impaired teaching capacity. The assessment utilises statutory and common law criteria for loss of earning capacity, applies conventional discounts for vicissitudes, and global buffer for future loss where quantification is inherently imprecise due to professional uncertainties. Defendant's arguments regarding pre-existing vulnerabilities and caregiving responsibilities do not sufficiently diminish plaintiff's entitlement...

Court Disposition

Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $670,494.90
  • The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis unless either party can show entitlement to another order for costs