Jones v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 538

Jones v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 538

The Court refused to accede to the motion for a blanket or indefinite deferral of mediation (except as to limited issues) on the ground that the Statewide ILUA Strategy, while valuable, did not justify stalling proceedings to the detriment of other parties seeking progress. The Court emphasised the need to balance private negotiation initiatives with statutory mediation processes, and determined that each native title application should be considered on its circumstances at the relevant time.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Application for Determination of Native Title / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Mediation Referral and Adjournment
Outcome
Motion for indefinite or limited mediation refused; adjourned for further consideration.
Legal Topics
['mediation Referrals' 'adjournment' 'indigenous Land Use Agreements (ilua)' 'section 86 B Native Title Act' 'federal Court Procedure']
['native Title'] ['mediation Referrals' 'adjournment' 'indigenous Land Use Agreements (ilua)' 'section 86 B Native Title Act' 'federal Court Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Determination of Native Title / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Mediation Referral and Adjournment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should order that only limited aspects of the proceeding be referred for mediation under s 86B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) while the Statewide ILUA Strategy is pursued' 'Whether the application of the Statewide ILUA Strategy justifies deferring further progress of the application except as to certain issues']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court refused to accede to the motion for a blanket or indefinite deferral of mediation (except as to limited issues) on the ground that the Statewide ILUA Strategy, while valuable, did not justify stalling proceedings to the detriment of other parties seeking progress. The Court emphasised the need to balance private negotiation initiatives with statutory mediation processes, and determined that each native title application should be considered on its circumstances at the relevant time.

Court Disposition

Motion for indefinite or limited mediation refused; adjourned for further consideration.

Orders

  • ['Notice of motion adjourned to 10 am 5 August 2003 for further hearing.' 'Directions hearing fixed for 10 am 5 August 2003 in this application.']