Salucci v Amaca Pty Ltd [2009] NSWDDT 33
Causation was raised before the mediator because the mediator's certificate, read as a whole, identified exposure, damages and causation as issues for trial. The defendant acted reasonably in obtaining Dr Gardiner's report, had reserved its right to amend its Reply, and the information in that report was not reasonably discoverable before the Reply was served. The defendant was therefore permitted to file a defence limited to causation, exposure and damages.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Dust Diseases Tribunal Proceedings for Damages for Alleged Asbestos Exposure Causing Malignant Mesothelioma / Ruling After Mediation and Before Trial on Whether Causation Could Be Raised as an Issue
- Outcome
- The defendant was permitted to file a defence raising causation, exposure and damages, with costs of the application and costs relating to causation awarded to the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ["mediator's Certificate" 'issues in Dispute' 'amendment of Reply or Defence' 'causation' 'reasonable Discoverability of Facts' 'malignant Mesothelioma']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Dust Diseases Tribunal Proceedings for Damages for Alleged Asbestos Exposure Causing Malignant Mesothelioma / Ruling After Mediation and Before Trial on Whether Causation Could Be Raised as an Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether causation was raised as an issue before the mediator and included in the mediator's certificate." "Whether cl 29 of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 permitted the defendant to change the facts relied on after serving its Reply based on Dr Gardiner's report." 'Whether the defendant should be permitted to file a defence raising causation, exposure and damages.']
Ratio Decidendi
Causation was raised before the mediator because the mediator's certificate, read as a whole, identified exposure, damages and causation as issues for trial. The defendant acted reasonably in obtaining Dr Gardiner's report, had reserved its right to amend its Reply, and the information in that report was not reasonably discoverable before the Reply was served. The defendant was therefore permitted to file a defence limited to causation, exposure and damages.
Court Disposition
The defendant was permitted to file a defence raising causation, exposure and damages, with costs of the application and costs relating to causation awarded to the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['Defendant, if so advised, to serve further report of Dr Gardiner on or before 15 January 2010.' "Defendant to serve other experts' reports and witness statements on or before 15 January 2010." 'Plaintiff to serve reports and witness statements in reply on or before 20 January 2010.' 'Liberty to apply.' 'Defendant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment