Medical Australia Ltd, in the matter of Medical Australia Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1429
The Scheme was approved because the statutory majority was obtained, the first court orders were complied with despite the identified issue concerning 29,600 traded shares, ASIC had provided a no-objection letter, the conditions precedent other than Court approval and lodgement with ASIC had been satisfied or waived, the Scheme was fair and reasonable and supported by those voting, there was no evidence of oppression, inadequate disclosure or public policy objection, and the deed poll had been duly executed by ICU Medical, Inc. and ICU Medical B.V.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Approval of Scheme of Arrangement / Second Court Hearing
- Outcome
- Application allowed; scheme of arrangement approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['schemes of Arrangement' "approval of Members' Scheme" 'corporations Act 2001 (cth) S 411' 'shareholder Meeting and Statutory Majority' 'asic No Objection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of Scheme of Arrangement / Second Court Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the statutory majority required for a members' scheme by s 411(4)(a)(ii) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) had been obtained." 'Whether Medical Australia complied with the orders made at the first hearing for despatch of the scheme booklet and convening of the scheme meeting.' 'Whether ASIC had indicated that it had no objection to the Scheme under s 411(17) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to approve the Scheme.' 'Whether the deed poll had been duly executed by ICU Medical, Inc. and ICU Medical B.V.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Scheme was approved because the statutory majority was obtained, the first court orders were complied with despite the identified issue concerning 29,600 traded shares, ASIC had provided a no-objection letter, the conditions precedent other than Court approval and lodgement with ASIC had been satisfied or waived, the Scheme was fair and reasonable and supported by those voting, there was no evidence of oppression, inadequate disclosure or public policy objection, and the deed poll had been duly executed by ICU Medical, Inc. and ICU Medical B.V.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; scheme of arrangement approved.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) that the scheme of arrangement (Scheme) made between the plaintiff and the holders of ordinary shares in the plaintiff, the terms of which scheme of arrangement are set out in Annexure C of the document which has been tendered and marked...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment