Meegan Webb v Hornsby Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1715
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the Section 96 application with specified condition changes.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and Section 96 Application No. DA/72/2010/B is approved with specified deletion, amendment and insertion of conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 's 34(3) Orders' 'section 96 Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "What orders should be made to give effect to the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and approving the Section 96 application with specified condition changes.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and Section 96 Application No. DA/72/2010/B is approved with specified deletion, amendment and insertion of conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Section 96 Application No. DA/72/2010/B is approved with the deletion of conditions 3a, 23 and 24, the amendment of condition 26, and the insertion of additional conditions 27A and 27B. A copy of the consolidated conditions is set out in Annexure A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment