Goo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 853

The application was dismissed because the applicant identified no reviewable ground under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the Tribunal had material before it to support its findings, and the Court discerned no legal or procedural error in the Tribunal's treatment of the protection visa claim.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 09 June 2000
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome: Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Legal Topics: ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'persecution for Convention Reasons' 'racial Discrimination']

['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'persecution for Convention Reasons' 'racial Discrimination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Final Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicant identified any relevant ground of judicial review under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision contained legal or procedural error reviewable by the Court." "Whether the Tribunal was entitled to conclude that the discrimination suffered by the applicant did not amount to persecution for the purposes of Australia's protection obligations."]

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs."]