Lennox, M.D. v. Megray Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 568

Lennox, M.D. v. Megray Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 568

Falsely labelling helmets with approval and compliance marks, when such helmets had not passed the requisite procedures under the Standards Association scheme, constituted breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974 ss.55 and 53(c), warranting conviction and fines even where mitigating factors existed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 September 1985
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Convicted with fines imposed; costs ordered; leave to withdraw granted in one proceeding
Legal Topics
['false or Misleading Representations' 'labelling' 'approval and Sponsorship in Trade or Commerce']
['trade Practices' 'consumer Protection' 'criminal Law'] ['false or Misleading Representations' 'labelling' 'approval and Sponsorship in Trade or Commerce']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the labelling and supply of helmets constituted misleading representations of approval contrary to the Trade Practices Act 1974' 'Whether conduct was liable to mislead as to the manufacturing process of goods']

Ratio Decidendi

Falsely labelling helmets with approval and compliance marks, when such helmets had not passed the requisite procedures under the Standards Association scheme, constituted breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974 ss.55 and 53(c), warranting conviction and fines even where mitigating factors existed.

Court Disposition

Convicted with fines imposed; costs ordered; leave to withdraw granted in one proceeding

Orders

  • ['In proceeding VG23 of 1985, defendant convicted and fined $3,000; prosecutor’s costs to be taxed and paid by the defendant.' 'In proceeding VG24 of 1985, defendant convicted and fined $4,000; prosecutor’s costs to be taxed and paid by the defendant.' 'In proceeding VG25 of 1985, defendant convicted and fined...