Ogawa v Buckingham (No 2) [2023] FCA 1387
The applicant failed to provide any proper, reasonable or adequate explanation for her failure to attend the trial and failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable case of error in the Registrar's decision. Accordingly, there was no adequate basis for setting aside the dismissal order, and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Set Aside Judgment Under R 39.05(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011; Heard on the Papers
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['setting Aside Judgments' 'failure to Appear at Hearing' 'judicial Review' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Set Aside Judgment Under R 39.05(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011; Heard on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant has established a proper basis to set aside the dismissal order under r 39.05(a)' "Whether there was an adequate explanation for the applicant's failure to appear" "Whether the applicant demonstrated a reasonably arguable case of error in the Registrar's decision"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide any proper, reasonable or adequate explanation for her failure to attend the trial and failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable case of error in the Registrar's decision. Accordingly, there was no adequate basis for setting aside the dismissal order, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application dismissed
Orders
- ["The applicant's interlocutory application filed on 18 April 2023 be dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment